Haiti vs Slovakia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Haiti
- Slovakia
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 23,530 t against 22,962 t in Slovakia, a difference of 568 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Haiti ranks 107th and Slovakia ranks 108th of 200 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,335 t | 55,813 t | 40,478 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 22,530 t | 37,648 t | 15,118 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 23,099 t | 28,107 t | 5,008 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 23,461 t | 23,971 t | 509.17 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Haiti or Slovakia?
- Haiti, at 23,530 t against 22,962 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Haiti and Slovakia?
- 568 t, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Slovakia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Haiti ranks 107th and Slovakia ranks 108th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).