Japan vs Sudan (former): Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Japan
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Japan currently reports 132,494 t against 122,557 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 9,937 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Sudan (former)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 44th and Sudan (former) ranks 47th of 200 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 83,186 t | 19,848 t | 63,338 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 122,096 t | 27,234 t | 94,862 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 151,754 t | 41,956 t | 109,797 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 153,595 t | 67,046 t | 86,548 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 139,219 t | 115,353 t | 23,866 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 127,604 t | 124,259 t | 3,344 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Japan or Sudan (former)?
- Japan, at 132,494 t against 122,557 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Japan and Sudan (former)?
- 9,937 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Japan and Sudan (former) rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Japan ranks 44th and Sudan (former) ranks 47th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).