Kazakhstan vs Philippines: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Philippines
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 159,039 t against 158,541 t in Philippines, a difference of 498 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 31st and Philippines ranks 32nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 189,348 t | 125,210 t | 64,138 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 132,457 t | 153,696 t | 21,239 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 162,059 t | 158,622 t | 3,436 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 157,457 t | 158,284 t | 826.25 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Philippines?
- Kazakhstan, at 159,039 t against 158,541 t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Philippines?
- 498 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Philippines?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Philippines rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 31st and Philippines ranks 32nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).