Kenya vs Portugal: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kenya
- Portugal
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 72,828 t against 67,984 t in Portugal, a difference of 4,844 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.
Kenya ranks 63rd and Portugal ranks 66th of 200 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,512 t | 65,380 t | 48,868 t | Portugal |
| 1970s | 20,240 t | 72,900 t | 52,660 t | Portugal |
| 1980s | 29,709 t | 92,697 t | 62,988 t | Portugal |
| 1990s | 39,375 t | 89,702 t | 50,327 t | Portugal |
| 2000s | 48,965 t | 85,476 t | 36,511 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 62,055 t | 82,149 t | 20,094 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 71,408 t | 76,859 t | 5,451 t | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Kenya or Portugal?
- Kenya, at 72,828 t against 67,984 t in Portugal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Kenya and Portugal?
- 4,844 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Portugal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Portugal rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Kenya ranks 63rd and Portugal ranks 66th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).