Latvia vs Rwanda: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Latvia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 16,611 t against 13,418 t in Rwanda, a difference of 3,193 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 122nd and Rwanda ranks 124th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,219 t | 3,557 t | 28,662 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 18,741 t | 7,970 t | 10,771 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 17,765 t | 20,433 t | 2,668 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 17,417 t | 18,100 t | 683.15 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Latvia or Rwanda?
- Latvia, at 16,611 t against 13,418 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Latvia and Rwanda?
- 3,193 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Latvia ranks 122nd and Rwanda ranks 124th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).