Latvia vs Tunisia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen

Latvia
16,611 t
in 2023
Tunisia
16,874 t
in 2023
Latvia rank
122nd
Tunisia rank
121st

Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Latvia
  • Tunisia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 16,874 t against 16,611 t in Latvia, a difference of 263 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 122nd and Tunisia ranks 121st of 200 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 32,219 t 8,782 t 23,437 t Latvia
2000s 18,741 t 12,385 t 6,357 t Latvia
2010s 17,765 t 15,301 t 2,464 t Latvia
2020s 17,417 t 16,638 t 778.58 t Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Latvia or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 16,874 t against 16,611 t in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Latvia and Tunisia?
263 t, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tunisia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Tunisia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
Latvia ranks 122nd and Tunisia ranks 121st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).