Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Latvia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 17,301 t against 16,611 t in Latvia, a difference of 690 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 200 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,219 t | 13,637 t | 18,582 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 18,741 t | 14,608 t | 4,134 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 17,765 t | 15,349 t | 2,416 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 17,417 t | 16,195 t | 1,222 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 17,301 t against 16,611 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 690 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Latvia ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).