Lesotho vs Luxembourg: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Lesotho
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 2,752 t against 2,006 t in Lesotho, a difference of 746 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.4 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 161st and Luxembourg ranks 158th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,491 t | 2,824 t | 667.48 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 2,622 t | 2,920 t | 298.09 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 1,996 t | 2,844 t | 848.52 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Lesotho or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 2,752 t against 2,006 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Lesotho and Luxembourg?
- 746 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Luxembourg rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Lesotho ranks 161st and Luxembourg ranks 158th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).