Liberia vs New Zealand: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Liberia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 5,313 t against 4,978 t in Liberia, a difference of 335 t.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Liberia ranks 134th and New Zealand ranks 133rd of 184 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,209 t | 3,279 t | 2,071 t | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 1,589 t | 3,633 t | 2,044 t | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 2,198 t | 3,589 t | 1,391 t | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 2,164 t | 4,087 t | 1,923 t | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 2,766 t | 4,898 t | 2,132 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 4,876 t | 5,514 t | 638.56 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 4,958 t | 5,440 t | 482.14 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Liberia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 5,313 t against 4,978 t in Liberia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Liberia and New Zealand?
- 335 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and New Zealand rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Liberia ranks 134th and New Zealand ranks 133rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).