Libya vs New Zealand: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Libya
- New Zealand
How they compare
Libya currently reports 6,297 t against 5,313 t in New Zealand, a difference of 984 t.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.
Libya ranks 141st and New Zealand ranks 144th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,259 t | 3,279 t | 2,020 t | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 1,896 t | 3,633 t | 1,737 t | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 2,842 t | 3,589 t | 747.17 t | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 3,828 t | 4,087 t | 258.65 t | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 4,624 t | 4,898 t | 274.67 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 5,952 t | 5,514 t | 437.15 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 6,164 t | 5,440 t | 724.21 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Libya or New Zealand?
- Libya, at 6,297 t against 5,313 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Libya and New Zealand?
- 984 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and New Zealand rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Libya ranks 141st and New Zealand ranks 144th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).