Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.25 million t
in 2023
Pakistan
1.16 million t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
10th
Pakistan rank
6th

Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Pakistan
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 2.25 million t against 1.16 million t in Pakistan, a difference of 1.10 million t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.9 times Pakistan's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Pakistan ranks 6th of 29 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 712,236 t 162,001 t 550,235 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 862,561 t 207,928 t 654,633 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 975,475 t 278,242 t 697,233 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 1.08 million t 395,370 t 682,700 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 1.36 million t 529,805 t 828,349 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 1.88 million t 792,994 t 1.09 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 2.22 million t 1.08 million t 1.14 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Pakistan?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 2.25 million t against 1.16 million t in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan?
1.10 million t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Pakistan ranks 6th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-nitrogen/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-nitrogen/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/pakistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).