Luxembourg vs Qatar: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Luxembourg
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 3,508 t against 2,752 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 756 t.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.3 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 158th and Qatar ranks 156th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,824 t | 548.57 t | 2,275 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 2,920 t | 1,438 t | 1,482 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 2,844 t | 3,162 t | 317.83 t | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Luxembourg or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 3,508 t against 2,752 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Luxembourg and Qatar?
- 756 t, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Qatar?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Qatar rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Luxembourg ranks 158th and Qatar ranks 156th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).