Malaysia vs Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Malaysia
- Sudan
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 90,823 t against 85,715 t in Sudan, a difference of 5,108 t.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Malaysia ranks 45th and Sudan ranks 47th of 185 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 85,683 t | 85,391 t | 292.01 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 88,392 t | 86,209 t | 2,183 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Malaysia or Sudan?
- Malaysia, at 90,823 t against 85,715 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Malaysia and Sudan?
- 5,108 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Malaysia ranks 45th and Sudan ranks 47th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).