Malaysia vs Uganda: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Malaysia
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 105,391 t against 90,823 t in Malaysia, a difference of 14,568 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 50th and Uganda ranks 49th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20,138 t | 6,788 t | 13,350 t | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 27,158 t | 10,142 t | 17,016 t | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 35,608 t | 14,641 t | 20,967 t | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 43,836 t | 31,845 t | 11,991 t | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 62,916 t | 48,993 t | 13,924 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 83,490 t | 79,690 t | 3,800 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 88,392 t | 103,390 t | 14,999 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Malaysia or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 105,391 t against 90,823 t in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Malaysia and Uganda?
- 14,568 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Uganda rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Malaysia ranks 50th and Uganda ranks 49th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).