Mali vs Paraguay: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mali
- Paraguay
How they compare
Mali currently reports 41,364 t against 38,320 t in Paraguay, a difference of 3,044 t.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Paraguay ahead.
Mali ranks 87th and Paraguay ranks 88th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,125 t | 14,563 t | 5,438 t | Paraguay |
| 1970s | 9,540 t | 19,161 t | 9,621 t | Paraguay |
| 1980s | 11,343 t | 29,514 t | 18,171 t | Paraguay |
| 1990s | 13,213 t | 45,208 t | 31,994 t | Paraguay |
| 2000s | 21,382 t | 34,260 t | 12,879 t | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 30,185 t | 35,837 t | 5,652 t | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 39,118 t | 38,432 t | 685.8 t | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Mali or Paraguay?
- Mali, at 41,364 t against 38,320 t in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Mali and Paraguay?
- 3,044 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Paraguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Paraguay rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Mali ranks 87th and Paraguay ranks 88th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).