Montenegro vs Puerto Rico: Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Montenegro
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 4,260 t against 3,764 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 496 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Montenegro ranks 151st and Puerto Rico ranks 153rd of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,829 t | 6,161 t | 332.29 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 4,987 t | 5,294 t | 307.36 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 4,294 t | 4,079 t | 215.1 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland nitrogen, Montenegro or Puerto Rico?
- Montenegro, at 4,260 t against 3,764 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland nitrogen between Montenegro and Puerto Rico?
- 496 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Puerto Rico?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Puerto Rico rank globally for manure applied β cropland nitrogen?
- Montenegro ranks 151st and Puerto Rico ranks 153rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).