Peru vs Sudan (former): Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Peru
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Peru currently reports 127,355 t against 122,557 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 4,798 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 45th and Sudan (former) ranks 47th of 200 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 4 and Sudan (former) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 50,557 t | 19,848 t | 30,709 t | Peru |
| 1970s | 61,141 t | 27,234 t | 33,907 t | Peru |
| 1980s | 67,364 t | 41,956 t | 25,408 t | Peru |
| 1990s | 72,031 t | 67,046 t | 4,984 t | Peru |
| 2000s | 92,891 t | 115,353 t | 22,462 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 105,898 t | 124,259 t | 18,361 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Peru or Sudan (former)?
- Peru, at 127,355 t against 122,557 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Peru and Sudan (former)?
- 4,798 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Peru and Sudan (former) rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Peru ranks 45th and Sudan (former) ranks 47th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).