Puerto Rico vs Qatar: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Puerto Rico
- Qatar
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 3,764 t against 3,508 t in Qatar, a difference of 256 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 153rd and Qatar ranks 156th of 200 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,495 t | 14.1 t | 9,481 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 11,322 t | 34.59 t | 11,287 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 9,770 t | 158.09 t | 9,612 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 8,563 t | 395.16 t | 8,168 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 6,609 t | 548.57 t | 6,060 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 5,294 t | 1,438 t | 3,856 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 4,079 t | 3,162 t | 917.46 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Puerto Rico or Qatar?
- Puerto Rico, at 3,764 t against 3,508 t in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Puerto Rico and Qatar?
- 256 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Puerto Rico and Qatar rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Puerto Rico ranks 153rd and Qatar ranks 156th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).