Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Rwanda
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 13,418 t against 12,729 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 689 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Rwanda ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 125th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,439 t | 16,116 t | 14,677 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 2,183 t | 15,381 t | 13,198 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 3,093 t | 17,362 t | 14,269 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 3,522 t | 15,459 t | 11,938 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 7,970 t | 10,996 t | 3,025 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 20,433 t | 12,664 t | 7,769 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 18,100 t | 13,654 t | 4,446 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
- Rwanda, at 13,418 t against 12,729 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 689 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Rwanda ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 125th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).