Sri Lanka vs Yemen: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Sri Lanka
- Yemen
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 12,729 t against 12,181 t in Yemen, a difference of 548 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 125th and Yemen ranks 127th of 200 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,116 t | 3,192 t | 12,924 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 15,381 t | 2,543 t | 12,839 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 17,362 t | 3,897 t | 13,465 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 15,459 t | 5,295 t | 10,165 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 10,996 t | 8,508 t | 2,487 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 12,664 t | 11,121 t | 1,543 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 13,654 t | 12,159 t | 1,495 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Sri Lanka or Yemen?
- Sri Lanka, at 12,729 t against 12,181 t in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Sri Lanka and Yemen?
- 548 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Yemen?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Yemen rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Sri Lanka ranks 125th and Yemen ranks 127th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).