Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Tunisia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 17,301 t against 16,874 t in Tunisia, a difference of 427 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Tunisia ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,347 t | 8,339 t | 4,992 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 4,931 t | 12,383 t | 7,452 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 6,025 t | 12,420 t | 6,395 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 8,594 t | 13,836 t | 5,242 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 12,385 t | 14,608 t | 2,223 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 15,301 t | 15,349 t | 47.77 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 16,638 t | 16,195 t | 443.32 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Tunisia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 17,301 t against 16,874 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
- 427 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Tunisia ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).