Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Saudi Arabia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
1.56 kg/ha
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
1.6 kg/ha
in 2023
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank
150th
Saudi Arabia rank
147th

Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
  • Saudi Arabia
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 1.6 kg/ha against 1.56 kg/ha in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ahead.

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 150th and Saudi Arabia ranks 147th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of averaged higher in 6 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.33 kg/ha 0.0879 kg/ha 1.24 kg/ha Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
1970s 1.31 kg/ha 0.1869 kg/ha 1.12 kg/ha Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
1980s 1.07 kg/ha 0.5449 kg/ha 0.5276 kg/ha Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
1990s 1.1 kg/ha 0.657 kg/ha 0.4427 kg/ha Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
2000s 1.25 kg/ha 0.9419 kg/ha 0.3106 kg/ha Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
2010s 1.61 kg/ha 1.32 kg/ha 0.2818 kg/ha Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
2020s 1.55 kg/ha 1.58 kg/ha 0.0252 kg/ha Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 1.6 kg/ha against 1.56 kg/ha in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Saudi Arabia?
0.04 kg/ha, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Saudi Arabia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 150th and Saudi Arabia ranks 147th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Saudi Arabia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/afghanistan/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/afghanistan/saudi-arabia/">Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Saudi Arabia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).