Argentina vs Ethiopia PDR: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Argentina
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 1 kg/ha against 0.9546 kg/ha in Argentina, a difference of 0.0454 kg/ha.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 180th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 178th of 200 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.44 kg/ha | 0.731 kg/ha | 0.7088 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 1970s | 1.39 kg/ha | 0.7034 kg/ha | 0.688 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 1980s | 1.37 kg/ha | 0.8113 kg/ha | 0.5602 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 1990s | 1.06 kg/ha | 0.9825 kg/ha | 0.0738 kg/ha | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Argentina or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 1 kg/ha against 0.9546 kg/ha in Argentina as of 1992.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Argentina and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.0454 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Argentina and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Argentina ranks 180th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 178th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).