Azerbaijan vs Botswana: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Botswana
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 1.09 kg/ha against 1.07 kg/ha in Botswana, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Botswana ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 173rd and Botswana ranks 175th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.1 kg/ha | 1.81 kg/ha | 0.7044 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 2000s | 1.16 kg/ha | 2.27 kg/ha | 1.11 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 2010s | 1.28 kg/ha | 1.43 kg/ha | 0.1558 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 2020s | 1.13 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | 0.0658 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Azerbaijan or Botswana?
- Azerbaijan, at 1.09 kg/ha against 1.07 kg/ha in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Azerbaijan and Botswana?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Botswana?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Botswana rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 173rd and Botswana ranks 175th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).