Azerbaijan vs Sri Lanka: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 1.09 kg/ha against 1.02 kg/ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 162nd and Sri Lanka ranks 165th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.1 kg/ha | 1.54 kg/ha | 0.4413 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 1.16 kg/ha | 1.14 kg/ha | 0.0214 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 1.28 kg/ha | 1.15 kg/ha | 0.1286 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 1.13 kg/ha | 1.17 kg/ha | 0.0409 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Azerbaijan or Sri Lanka?
- Azerbaijan, at 1.09 kg/ha against 1.02 kg/ha in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 162nd and Sri Lanka ranks 165th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).