Bahamas vs Uzbekistan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Bahamas
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 17.25 kg/ha against 16.01 kg/ha in Bahamas, a difference of 1.24 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 26th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.19 kg/ha | 5.97 kg/ha | 12.22 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 17.41 kg/ha | 7.18 kg/ha | 10.23 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 15.48 kg/ha | 13.14 kg/ha | 2.34 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 15.97 kg/ha | 16.68 kg/ha | 0.7196 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Bahamas or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 17.25 kg/ha against 16.01 kg/ha in Bahamas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Bahamas and Uzbekistan?
- 1.24 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Uzbekistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Bahamas ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 26th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).