Bahrain vs Czechoslovakia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Bahrain
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 12.25 kg/ha against 12.05 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 0.2 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 39th and Czechoslovakia ranks 42nd of 200 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.649 kg/ha | 10.28 kg/ha | 9.63 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 1.69 kg/ha | 11.31 kg/ha | 9.62 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 3.25 kg/ha | 13.04 kg/ha | 9.79 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 4.22 kg/ha | 12.85 kg/ha | 8.63 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Bahrain or Czechoslovakia?
- Bahrain, at 12.25 kg/ha against 12.05 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Bahrain and Czechoslovakia?
- 0.2 kg/ha, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Bahrain and Czechoslovakia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Bahrain ranks 39th and Czechoslovakia ranks 42nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).