Belarus vs Suriname: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 8.18 kg/ha against 8.14 kg/ha in Belarus, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 61st and Suriname ranks 60th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.3 kg/ha | 5.57 kg/ha | 2.73 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 7.14 kg/ha | 6.61 kg/ha | 0.5344 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 8.11 kg/ha | 7.07 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 8.03 kg/ha | 8.35 kg/ha | 0.3262 kg/ha | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Belarus or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 8.18 kg/ha against 8.14 kg/ha in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Belarus and Suriname?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Suriname?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Suriname rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 61st and Suriname ranks 60th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).