Botswana vs Ethiopia PDR: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Botswana
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1.07 kg/ha against 1 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 175th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 178th of 200 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.01 kg/ha | 0.731 kg/ha | 0.2787 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 1970s | 1.54 kg/ha | 0.7034 kg/ha | 0.8362 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 1980s | 1.76 kg/ha | 0.8113 kg/ha | 0.9443 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 1990s | 1.97 kg/ha | 0.9825 kg/ha | 0.9897 kg/ha | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Botswana or Ethiopia PDR?
- Botswana, at 1.07 kg/ha against 1 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Botswana and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Botswana and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Botswana ranks 175th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 178th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).