Brazil vs Sweden: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Brazil
- Sweden
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 5.67 kg/ha against 5.63 kg/ha in Sweden, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Brazil ranks 89th and Sweden ranks 91st of 200 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.08 kg/ha | 8.36 kg/ha | 3.28 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1970s | 5.17 kg/ha | 8.14 kg/ha | 2.97 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1980s | 4.44 kg/ha | 8.23 kg/ha | 3.78 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1990s | 5.52 kg/ha | 7.96 kg/ha | 2.44 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 5.53 kg/ha | 7.46 kg/ha | 1.93 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2010s | 5.83 kg/ha | 7.14 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 5.63 kg/ha | 5.74 kg/ha | 0.1092 kg/ha | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Brazil or Sweden?
- Brazil, at 5.67 kg/ha against 5.63 kg/ha in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Brazil and Sweden?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Sweden rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Brazil ranks 89th and Sweden ranks 91st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).