Canada vs Egypt: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Canada
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 1.8 kg/ha against 1.75 kg/ha in Canada, a difference of 0.05 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 155th and Egypt ranks 154th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 6 and Egypt in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.6 kg/ha | 0.755 kg/ha | 0.8496 kg/ha | Canada |
| 1970s | 1.53 kg/ha | 0.9339 kg/ha | 0.5969 kg/ha | Canada |
| 1980s | 1.47 kg/ha | 1.23 kg/ha | 0.2401 kg/ha | Canada |
| 1990s | 1.51 kg/ha | 1.47 kg/ha | 0.0351 kg/ha | Canada |
| 2000s | 1.76 kg/ha | 1.57 kg/ha | 0.189 kg/ha | Canada |
| 2010s | 1.73 kg/ha | 1.71 kg/ha | 0.0206 kg/ha | Canada |
| 2020s | 1.76 kg/ha | 1.83 kg/ha | 0.0671 kg/ha | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Canada or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 1.8 kg/ha against 1.75 kg/ha in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Canada and Egypt?
- 0.05 kg/ha, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Egypt?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Egypt rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Canada ranks 155th and Egypt ranks 154th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).