Chad vs Lithuania: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Chad
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 2.66 kg/ha against 2.5 kg/ha in Chad, a difference of 0.16 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 138th and Lithuania ranks 136th of 200 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8155 kg/ha | 4.63 kg/ha | 3.81 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 1.23 kg/ha | 4.84 kg/ha | 3.61 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 1.66 kg/ha | 3.42 kg/ha | 1.76 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 2.3 kg/ha | 2.75 kg/ha | 0.4446 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Chad or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 2.66 kg/ha against 2.5 kg/ha in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Chad and Lithuania?
- 0.16 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Lithuania rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Chad ranks 138th and Lithuania ranks 136th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).