Colombia vs Tajikistan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Colombia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 15.15 kg/ha against 13.77 kg/ha in Tajikistan, a difference of 1.38 kg/ha.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 29th and Tajikistan ranks 32nd of 184 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.6 kg/ha | 6.76 kg/ha | 3.84 kg/ha | Colombia |
| 2000s | 15.12 kg/ha | 8.27 kg/ha | 6.84 kg/ha | Colombia |
| 2010s | 16.53 kg/ha | 12.64 kg/ha | 3.88 kg/ha | Colombia |
| 2020s | 14.38 kg/ha | 13.54 kg/ha | 0.838 kg/ha | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Colombia or Tajikistan?
- Colombia, at 15.15 kg/ha against 13.77 kg/ha in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Colombia and Tajikistan?
- 1.38 kg/ha, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Tajikistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Colombia ranks 29th and Tajikistan ranks 32nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).