Czechia vs Panama: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Panama
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 6.51 kg/ha against 5.96 kg/ha in Panama, a difference of 0.55 kg/ha.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 81st and Panama ranks 84th of 200 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.23 kg/ha | 3.67 kg/ha | 5.56 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 8.21 kg/ha | 4.19 kg/ha | 4.03 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 6.96 kg/ha | 5.01 kg/ha | 1.95 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 6.5 kg/ha | 5.77 kg/ha | 0.7213 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechia or Panama?
- Czechia, at 6.51 kg/ha against 5.96 kg/ha in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechia and Panama?
- 0.55 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Panama?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Panama rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 81st and Panama ranks 84th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).