Czechoslovakia vs Puerto Rico: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 12.05 kg/ha against 11.9 kg/ha in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.15 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 42nd and Puerto Rico ranks 43rd of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.28 kg/ha | 7.3 kg/ha | 2.98 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 11.31 kg/ha | 14.18 kg/ha | 2.87 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 13.04 kg/ha | 16.25 kg/ha | 3.22 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 12.85 kg/ha | 18.55 kg/ha | 5.69 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechoslovakia or Puerto Rico?
- Czechoslovakia, at 12.05 kg/ha against 11.9 kg/ha in Puerto Rico as of 1992.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechoslovakia and Puerto Rico?
- 0.15 kg/ha, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Puerto Rico?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Puerto Rico rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 42nd and Puerto Rico ranks 43rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).