Ecuador vs Pakistan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- Pakistan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 7.41 kg/ha against 7.18 kg/ha in Pakistan, a difference of 0.23 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 74th and Pakistan ranks 76th of 200 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.64 kg/ha | 0.916 kg/ha | 2.72 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 5.49 kg/ha | 1.2 kg/ha | 4.29 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 6.17 kg/ha | 1.58 kg/ha | 4.59 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 6.09 kg/ha | 2.32 kg/ha | 3.77 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 7.03 kg/ha | 3.14 kg/ha | 3.89 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 7.76 kg/ha | 4.76 kg/ha | 3 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 7.4 kg/ha | 6.63 kg/ha | 0.7676 kg/ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ecuador or Pakistan?
- Ecuador, at 7.41 kg/ha against 7.18 kg/ha in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 0.23 kg/ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Pakistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 74th and Pakistan ranks 76th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).