Egypt vs Liberia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Egypt
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 1.81 kg/ha against 1.8 kg/ha in Egypt, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 142nd and Liberia ranks 141st of 184 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 6 and Liberia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.755 kg/ha | 0.5321 kg/ha | 0.2229 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 1970s | 0.9339 kg/ha | 0.7021 kg/ha | 0.2318 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 1980s | 1.23 kg/ha | 0.9394 kg/ha | 0.289 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 1990s | 1.47 kg/ha | 1.06 kg/ha | 0.4123 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 2000s | 1.57 kg/ha | 1.13 kg/ha | 0.4438 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 2010s | 1.71 kg/ha | 1.78 kg/ha | 0.0717 kg/ha | Liberia |
| 2020s | 1.83 kg/ha | 1.8 kg/ha | 0.0257 kg/ha | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Egypt or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 1.81 kg/ha against 1.8 kg/ha in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Egypt and Liberia?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Liberia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Liberia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Egypt ranks 142nd and Liberia ranks 141st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).