Eritrea vs Saudi Arabia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 1.6 kg/ha against 1.56 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 161st and Saudi Arabia ranks 159th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.37 kg/ha | 0.6896 kg/ha | 0.6832 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1.44 kg/ha | 0.9419 kg/ha | 0.4983 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 1.5 kg/ha | 1.32 kg/ha | 0.1784 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 1.56 kg/ha | 1.58 kg/ha | 0.018 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Eritrea or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 1.6 kg/ha against 1.56 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Eritrea and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Saudi Arabia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Saudi Arabia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 161st and Saudi Arabia ranks 159th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).