Estonia vs Mauritius: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 4.46 kg/ha against 4.23 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 0.23 kg/ha.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 101st and Mauritius ranks 98th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.83 kg/ha | 1.8 kg/ha | 4.02 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 5.6 kg/ha | 2.66 kg/ha | 2.94 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 4.96 kg/ha | 4 kg/ha | 0.9587 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 4.41 kg/ha | 4.43 kg/ha | 0.0229 kg/ha | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Estonia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 4.46 kg/ha against 4.23 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Estonia and Mauritius?
- 0.23 kg/ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Mauritius?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Mauritius rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 101st and Mauritius ranks 98th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).