Estonia vs South Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Estonia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 4.23 kg/ha against 3.93 kg/ha in South Sudan, a difference of 0.3 kg/ha.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 100th and South Sudan ranks 102nd of 184 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.91 kg/ha | 3.42 kg/ha | 1.49 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 4.41 kg/ha | 3.97 kg/ha | 0.441 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Estonia or South Sudan?
- Estonia, at 4.23 kg/ha against 3.93 kg/ha in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Estonia and South Sudan?
- 0.3 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and South Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 100th and South Sudan ranks 102nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).