Ethiopia PDR vs Sri Lanka: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 1.02 kg/ha against 1 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 165th and Sri Lanka ranks 164th of 184 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.731 kg/ha | 1.69 kg/ha | 0.961 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 0.7034 kg/ha | 1.51 kg/ha | 0.8032 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 0.8113 kg/ha | 1.75 kg/ha | 0.9363 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0.9825 kg/ha | 1.71 kg/ha | 0.7289 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 1.02 kg/ha against 1 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 165th and Sri Lanka ranks 164th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).