Ethiopia vs Kazakhstan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 1.29 kg/ha against 1.26 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 165th and Kazakhstan ranks 167th of 200 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9171 kg/ha | 1.2 kg/ha | 0.2832 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.9821 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | 0.0649 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 1.21 kg/ha | 1.26 kg/ha | 0.047 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 1.22 kg/ha | 1.25 kg/ha | 0.0336 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ethiopia or Kazakhstan?
- Ethiopia, at 1.29 kg/ha against 1.26 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ethiopia and Kazakhstan?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Kazakhstan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Kazakhstan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 165th and Kazakhstan ranks 167th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).