Fiji vs Iceland: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Fiji
- Iceland
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 7.45 kg/ha against 7.43 kg/ha in Iceland, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.
Fiji ranks 71st and Iceland ranks 73rd of 200 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.8 kg/ha | 7.03 kg/ha | 5.23 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1970s | 2.88 kg/ha | 7.18 kg/ha | 4.31 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1980s | 3.62 kg/ha | 7.15 kg/ha | 3.53 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1990s | 4.42 kg/ha | 7.21 kg/ha | 2.78 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2000s | 6.4 kg/ha | 6.99 kg/ha | 0.5974 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2010s | 6.67 kg/ha | 7.55 kg/ha | 0.8827 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2020s | 6.56 kg/ha | 7.45 kg/ha | 0.8967 kg/ha | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Fiji or Iceland?
- Fiji, at 7.45 kg/ha against 7.43 kg/ha in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Fiji and Iceland?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Iceland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Iceland rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 71st and Iceland ranks 73rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).