Georgia vs Kiribati: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Kiribati
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 3.08 kg/ha against 2.94 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 127th and Kiribati ranks 130th of 200 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.24 kg/ha | 1.43 kg/ha | 0.816 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 3.13 kg/ha | 2.24 kg/ha | 0.8886 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 2.91 kg/ha | 2.74 kg/ha | 0.1629 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 3.15 kg/ha | 2.92 kg/ha | 0.2384 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Georgia or Kiribati?
- Georgia, at 3.08 kg/ha against 2.94 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Georgia and Kiribati?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kiribati?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Kiribati rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 127th and Kiribati ranks 130th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).