Germany vs Tajikistan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Germany
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 13.77 kg/ha against 13.03 kg/ha in Germany, a difference of 0.74 kg/ha.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 37th and Tajikistan ranks 34th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.45 kg/ha | 6.76 kg/ha | 9.7 kg/ha | Germany |
| 2000s | 15.2 kg/ha | 8.27 kg/ha | 6.92 kg/ha | Germany |
| 2010s | 14.78 kg/ha | 12.64 kg/ha | 2.13 kg/ha | Germany |
| 2020s | 12.84 kg/ha | 13.54 kg/ha | 0.6998 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Germany or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 13.77 kg/ha against 13.03 kg/ha in Germany as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Germany and Tajikistan?
- 0.74 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Tajikistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Germany ranks 37th and Tajikistan ranks 34th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).