Haiti vs Slovak Republic: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Haiti
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 4.29 kg/ha against 4.26 kg/ha in Haiti, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
Haiti ranks 99th and Slovak Republic ranks 98th of 184 countries.
Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.04 kg/ha | 9.34 kg/ha | 6.31 kg/ha | Slovak Republic |
| 2000s | 4.34 kg/ha | 6.95 kg/ha | 2.61 kg/ha | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 3.62 kg/ha | 5.16 kg/ha | 1.54 kg/ha | Slovak Republic |
| 2020s | 4.25 kg/ha | 4.43 kg/ha | 0.1792 kg/ha | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Haiti or Slovak Republic?
- Slovak Republic, at 4.29 kg/ha against 4.26 kg/ha in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Haiti and Slovak Republic?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Slovak Republic?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Slovak Republic rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Haiti ranks 99th and Slovak Republic ranks 98th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).