Honduras vs Peru: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Honduras
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4.73 kg/ha against 4.62 kg/ha in Honduras, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Honduras ranks 103rd and Peru ranks 102nd of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.22 kg/ha | 4.61 kg/ha | 1.39 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1970s | 2.95 kg/ha | 4.01 kg/ha | 1.06 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1980s | 2.61 kg/ha | 3.57 kg/ha | 0.9562 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1990s | 2.55 kg/ha | 3.37 kg/ha | 0.817 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2000s | 4.54 kg/ha | 4.18 kg/ha | 0.3628 kg/ha | Honduras |
| 2010s | 4.7 kg/ha | 4.68 kg/ha | 0.025 kg/ha | Honduras |
| 2020s | 4.61 kg/ha | 4.55 kg/ha | 0.0663 kg/ha | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Honduras or Peru?
- Peru, at 4.73 kg/ha against 4.62 kg/ha in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Honduras and Peru?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Peru rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Honduras ranks 103rd and Peru ranks 102nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).