Italy vs Nepal: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Italy
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 7.74 kg/ha against 7.56 kg/ha in Italy, a difference of 0.18 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 69th and Nepal ranks 68th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.46 kg/ha | 3.71 kg/ha | 2.75 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1970s | 8.62 kg/ha | 3.91 kg/ha | 4.71 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1980s | 9.25 kg/ha | 4.55 kg/ha | 4.7 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1990s | 8.81 kg/ha | 5.05 kg/ha | 3.76 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2000s | 8.76 kg/ha | 6.03 kg/ha | 2.74 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2010s | 9.3 kg/ha | 8.45 kg/ha | 0.8519 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2020s | 8.1 kg/ha | 9.72 kg/ha | 1.62 kg/ha | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Italy or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 7.74 kg/ha against 7.56 kg/ha in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Italy and Nepal?
- 0.18 kg/ha, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Nepal rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Italy ranks 69th and Nepal ranks 68th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).