Jamaica vs Malawi: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Jamaica
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 8.38 kg/ha against 8.26 kg/ha in Jamaica, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 58th and Malawi ranks 57th of 200 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.31 kg/ha | 0.4171 kg/ha | 2.89 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 5.38 kg/ha | 0.474 kg/ha | 4.9 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 6.37 kg/ha | 0.5862 kg/ha | 5.78 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 5.29 kg/ha | 0.6662 kg/ha | 4.62 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 6.47 kg/ha | 0.9706 kg/ha | 5.5 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 8.11 kg/ha | 3.8 kg/ha | 4.31 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 8.25 kg/ha | 7.59 kg/ha | 0.6678 kg/ha | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Jamaica or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 8.38 kg/ha against 8.26 kg/ha in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Jamaica and Malawi?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Malawi rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Jamaica ranks 58th and Malawi ranks 57th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).