Japan vs Yugoslav SFR: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Japan
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Japan currently reports 10.25 kg/ha against 9.86 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 0.39 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Japan ranks 47th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 49th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Yugoslav SFR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.62 kg/ha | 8.54 kg/ha | 3.92 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 7.11 kg/ha | 9.87 kg/ha | 2.76 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 9.22 kg/ha | 10.68 kg/ha | 1.46 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 9.99 kg/ha | 9.86 kg/ha | 0.1257 kg/ha | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Japan or Yugoslav SFR?
- Japan, at 10.25 kg/ha against 9.86 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Japan and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.39 kg/ha, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Japan and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Japan ranks 47th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 49th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).